Bad things about love actually

Autor:

Bad things about love actually
Bad things about love actually

I first made this case in my original review almost a decade ago, and those who want to get a sense of where Im headed are welcome to have a look. But in light of the films 10th anniversary, I wanted to delve a little deeper. So I watched Love Actually again, andto my surpriseI found it even more hostile to the concept of romance than Id remembered.

Well yes, evidently. Over the course of several conversations with friends and colleagues, some of them conducted with good cheer but at high volumeI refer interested parties to the Twitter feeds of Atlantic employees on the afternoon of November 20thit was confirmed to me that a considerable number of people not only consider Love Actually a classic, but go so far as to watch the movie annually as a holiday tradition.

So take the film on its own titular terms. What does Love Actually tell us about love, actually? Well, I think it tells us a number of things, most of them wrong and a few of them appalling. Now, anyone who goes to the cineplex with any regularity knows that the last decade has seen more than its share of bad romantic comedies. But Love Actually is exceptional in that it is not merely, like so many other entries in the genre, unromantic. Rather, it is emphatically, almost shockingly, anti-romantic.

The file could not be found for a number of reasons such as the file being moved or deleted. Please check your spelling and if you still cant get to the right page try heading to the homepage for a look around.

Video on demand, bad things about love actually

For those in need of a plot refresher, the movie portrays, by my count, nine principal relationships: between the British prime minister (Hugh Grant) and a young member of his household staff (Martine McCutcheon); between a crime novelist (Colin Firth) and his Portuguese maid (Lcia Moniz); between a graphic designer (Laura Linney) and the colleague (Rodrigo Santoro) on whom shes had a long-standing crush; between a husband (Alan Rickman) and wife (Emma Thompson) stuck in a state of marital ennui; between a widower (Liam Neeson) and his lovesick stepson (Thomas Brodie-Sangster); between a new bride (Keira Knightley) and her husbands best friend (Andrew Lincoln); between an aging rocker (Bill Nighy) and his manager (Gregor Fisher); between two body doubles (Martin Freeman and Joanna Page) simulating sex acts on a movie set; and between a blundering British Lothario (Kris Marshall) and an escalatingly implausible series of American dream girls. There are other subsidiary relationships, but they serve primarily as foils (Rickmans sexually predatory assistant; Linneys needy, institutionalized brother), or to tie the major subplots together.

Sorry...We cant find the page you requestedThe file could not be found for a number of reasons such as the file being moved or deleted. Please check your spelling and if you still cant get to the right page try heading to the homepage for a look around.If you still have problems, try contacting us and well do what we can to help you. Click here to get back to where you came from.

Good Housekeeping participates in various affiliate marketing programs, which means we may get paid commissions on editorially chosen products purchased through our links to retailer sites.

Which isand please believe that I am being as diplomatic as I canutterly insane. Begin with the obvious: Love Actually is not, in fact, a holiday-season movie in any meaningful sense. Yes, it takes place in the weeks leading up to Christmas, and it features a Sisyphean parade of pop yuletide ditties. But this is not a movie about peace on Earth and goodwill toward men (or, for that matter, about what toys Santa will be placing under the tree). Insofar as Love Actually conveys the spirit of any holiday, that holiday is Valentines Dayand, indeed, the film served as a model for a few ensemble romantic comedies (Hes Just Not That Into You, Valentines Day) that have since been associated with that date.

Questions and answers to the phrase, bad things about love actually

Question: Why is the Prime Minister/Natalie relationship considered controversial?

Answer: The power imbalance between the Prime Minister and his subordinate, Natalie, raises concerns about workplace harassment and the abuse of authority.

Question: How does Love Actually perpetuate harmful gender stereotypes?

Answer: The film often relies on stereotypical gender roles, with men as pursuers and women as objects of affection, and perpetuates the idea that women need to be "fixed" or "won over".

Question: What is problematic about the Mark/Juliet storyline in Love Actually?

Answer: Mark's unrequited love for his best friend's wife, Juliet, is often seen as stalkerish and inappropriate, glorifying unhealthy obsession.

Question: What are some examples of unrealistic expectations set by Love Actually?

Answer: The film suggests that grand romantic gestures and dramatic declarations of love are essential for a successful relationship, ignoring the importance of communication, respect, and shared values.

Question: What are some criticisms of Love Actually's portrayal of relationships?

Answer: Many critics argue that Love Actually presents unrealistic and often sexist portrayals of love and relationships, promoting unhealthy romantic ideals.